Russia – reading and noting

soAll,

Obviously there are four things to do over the summer for your A level history.

  1. Your Year Twelve notes audit (USA and Tudor).
  2.  Your two timed papers.
  3.  Your coursework introduction tasks.
  4. Your Russia introduction reading and noting. 

PLEASE REMEMBER THAT YOU ARE HANDING IN ALL OF THE ABOVE IN YOUR FIRST LESSON BACK.

This post is intended to help you with the latter. PLease find an example of effective reading and noting of the first five pages of Satterwaite below. Underneath that, please find the videos that  I want you to watch. You should have x2 A4 pages of notes for each leader.

Mr Kydd.

Reading-and-noting-model

 

Posted in Enrichment | Comments Off on Russia – reading and noting

Enrichment – something to listen to – In Our Time – The Emancipation of the Serfs.

4If you click here you will get to last night’s edition of In Our Time on Radio 4. In it, Melvyn Bragg and guests discuss the 1861 declaration by Tsar Alexander II that serfs were now legally free of their landlords. It is a great opportunity to hear historians debate a topic that you are studying.

Programme description.

“Until then, over a third of Russians were tied to the land on which they lived and worked and in practice there was little to distinguish their condition from slavery. Russia had lost the Crimean War in 1855 and there had been hundreds of uprisings, prompting the Tsar to tell the nobles, “The existing condition of owning souls cannot remain unchanged. It is better to begin to destroy serfdom from above than to wait until that time when it begins to destroy itself from below.” Reform was constrained by the Tsar’s wish to keep the nobles on side and, for the serfs, tied by debt and law to the little land they were then allotted, the benefits were hard to see”.

With

Sarah Hudspith
Associate Professor in Russian at the University of Leeds

Simon Dixon
The Sir Bernard Pares Professor of Russian History at UCL

Shane O’Rourke
Senior Lecturer in History at the University of York

Mr Kydd.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Enrichment – something to listen to – In Our Time – The Emancipation of the Serfs.

Board work from revision today

War and revolution

 

Mr Kydd

Posted in Revision | Comments Off on Board work from revision today

Enrichment – the “Belsen boys” who came to Ascot.

Ivor PerlIf you click here you will get to an excellent article from the BBC website about Holocaust survivors who ended up in Ascot. Beyond its local significance, it is a reminder that soon such personal memories will be lost to us.

The image to the left here is one of those boys – Ivor Perl.

“Shortly after the end of World War Two a group of young Holocaust survivors was flown to the UK to recuperate. Thirty of them were housed in the Berkshire town of Ascot, famous for the pomp of the Royal Ascot horse races, where they made an incongruous sight, writes Rosie Whitehouse. Margaret Nutley remembers her first meeting with a group of unfamiliar boys on the Ascot racecourse. It was autumn 1945, and they were playing football, wearing striped jackets from a concentration camp. “The course was not fenced off as it is today and us local children used it as a playground. One day I went up with my friends to muck about and there they were. They were just there, playing like the rest of us. “The boys showed us their tattoos and talked about what had happened to them, but not boastfully.”

Mr Kydd.

Posted in Enrichment, Germany Kaiser to Furhrer course | Comments Off on Enrichment – the “Belsen boys” who came to Ascot.

Board work from the Easter revision sessions

DSC_0117

DSC_0111DSC_0112DSC_0111

 

Posted in Revision | Comments Off on Board work from the Easter revision sessions

Obituary – Linda Brown (Brown V Board)

3B3DBE20-3FB2-4721-A9E5-6738C73426DB_w650_r0_sA bit of enrichment for you IGCSE students.

If you click here you will get to The Guardian’s obituary for Linda Brown, the Kansas girl at the center of the 1954 supreme court ruling that concluded that “in the field of public education, the doctrine of ‘separate but equal’ has no place.”

Some helpful links follow.

“Topeka’s former Sumner School was all-white when Brown’s father, Oliver, tried to enroll the family. He became lead plaintiff in the 1954 Brown v Board of Education supreme court decision that ended school segregation. The landmark case began after several black families in Topeka were turned down when they tried to enroll their children in white schools near their homes. It was brought before the supreme court by the legal arm of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People and joined with cases from Delaware, South Carolina, Virginia and the District of Columbia.

On 17 May 1954, the supreme court ruled unanimously that separating black and white children was unconstitutional because it denied black children the 14th amendment guarantee of equal protection under the law.“In the field of public education, the doctrine of ‘separate but equal’ has no place,” chief justice Earl Warren wrote. “Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal.”

  • Click here for an article explaining the the hidden ripple effect of Brown v. Board of Education.4035
  • Click here for a discussion about the the Thurgood Marshall film.
  • More disturbingly, click here for a recent report suggesting that suggest that half a century of US civil rights gains have stalled or reversed recently.

Have a read and see what you think.

Mr Kydd.

 

Posted in Enrichment, history in the news, Obituaries | Comments Off on Obituary – Linda Brown (Brown V Board)

Materials from today’s revision conference

171121-131-3C3ECA39First of all, can I take this opportunity to thank you all for your excellent approach to what was a packed day. It was great to meet you, and I hope very much that it has set up your Easter revision.

As promised, below you will find electronic versions of the materials that we used. Also you will find the two videos that I referenced, and a link to that textbook. Finally, if you want to have an electronic version of the essay planning sheet that Little Heath and LVS  teachers used (to plan essays to send to your teachers) this can be found in the stick post at the top of this page.

Image-Of-Good-Luck

Interpretations introduction PowerPoint

Thematic essays introduction PowerPoint

Alexander debate areas

Provisional Government debate areas

Khrushchev debate areas

Evaluative Vocabulary

Government Questions resources

Khrushchev depth study seminar

Khrushchev interpretations successful reforms support

PG depth session

Spec paper

Spec paper essay – A2 – first go

Working class bleak plan support prompts

Working class thematic seminar

War essay plan

Russia 1855-1991: From Tsars to Commissars (Oxford Advanced History)

Mr Kydd

Posted in Revision | Comments Off on Materials from today’s revision conference

Enrichment – something to discuss – David Olusoga argues that by today’s standards some of Churchill’s actions were those a of a war criminal.

BBKsaxJ.imgOne for History Society…

If you click here you you will get to The Independent’s write up of David Olusoga’s suggestion that, today, some of Churchill’s actions would be considered war crimes. In it he states, “while I’m personally glad that Churchill overcame Halifax in early 1940 and it was Churchill who faced the Nazis that year andthe-bombing-of-dresden-statue-overlooking-city the years that followed, that doesn’t mean that he wasn’t’ somebody that wasn’t responsible, or largely responsible, for the Bengal famine.”

Have a read and see what you think. You might like to also read about the bombing of Dresden as well. For balance, you should also read this account from the Imperial War Museum explaining how Churchill’s leadership did so much to save Western civilisation.

David Olusoga is one the three hosts of Civilisations – on BBC Two.

Mr  Kydd.

Posted in historians, history in the news | Comments Off on Enrichment – something to discuss – David Olusoga argues that by today’s standards some of Churchill’s actions were those a of a war criminal.

Year Nine prep

_80480260_80480259All,

Following on from today’s lesson, for prep I would like you to do the following.

  •  Explore the three BBC web pages below.

This account of the 70th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz II-Birkenau (here).

The audio slideshow from the Auschwitz Museum explaining the problems of preserving the ageing and crumbling 191-hectare site, with limited funds (here).

Two experts on Auschwitz arguing for and against the idea that the former Nazi death camp should be allowed to crumble away (here)

  • Then post which view you agree with more (and why) below. One paragraph please.

Please note, for your post to appear, I will need to approve it – so don’t worry it is does not show up straight away.

You can of course discuss this with people at home.

Mr Kydd.

Posted in Uncategorized | 28 Comments

Enrichment – something to listen to. The assassination of Alexander II

p01gn2t5If you click here you will get to a 45 minute In Our Time broadcast from Radio 4. In it Melvyn Bragg discusses the significance of the assassination of Alexander II.

An excellent discussion that will help you a lot with those turning points in government essays.

“On 1st March 1881, the Russian Tsar, Alexander II, was travelling through the snow to the Winter Palace in St Petersburg. An armed Cossack sat with the coach driver, another six Cossacks followed on horseback and behind them came a group of police officers in sledges. It was the day that the Tsar, known for his liberal reforms, had signed a document granting the first ever constitution to the Russian people.But his journey was being watched by a group of radicals called ‘Narodnaya Volya’ or ‘The People’s Will’. On a street corner near the Catherine Canal, they hurled the first of their bombs to halt the Tsar’s iron-clad coach. When Alexander ignored advice and ventured out onto the snow to comfort his dying Cossacks, he was killed by another bomber who took his own life in the blast.

Why did they kill the reforming Tsar?

What was the political climate that inspired such extreme acts?

And could this have been the moment that the Russian state started an inexorable march towards revolution?

With Orlando Figes, Professor of History at Birkbeck College, University of London; Dominic Lieven, Professor of Russian Government, London School of Economics; Catriona Kelly, Professor of Russian, Oxford University.”

Have a listen and see what you think.

Mr Kydd.

Posted in Enrichment | Comments Off on Enrichment – something to listen to. The assassination of Alexander II