Obituary – John Bossy

f39ab74b-3176-4782-a28f-100f58736be3-1360x2040Year Twelve,

Apologies – this news passed me by at the time. You will come across John Bossy when you write on Elizabethan religion. He was very much an original thinker, and wrote beautifully. He died in December, and ‘s obituary in The Guardian can be found here.

An extract follows.

“Deftly bypassing traditional disputes between historians of the Catholic Reformation and Counter-Reformation, Bossy dug deeper to discern a profound shift from Christianity being conceived as a community of believers to its being understood in terms of rival confessions of belief. This he considered, controversially, to be a wholly negative development, leading to a diminished religious universe, in which Christianity no longer performed the social miracle of ritualised reconciliation, symbolised by the role of the kiss of peace at the Mass. Instead, there was a new stress on the distinction between the godly – represented by seminary-trained priests and dynamic missionaries spouting hell-fire sermons – and the majority, for whom printed catechisms reduced Christianity to what could be taught and learned.”

Mr Kydd.

Posted in historians, Obituaries, The Later Tudors | Comments Off on Obituary – John Bossy

Enrichment – places to go

If the video above interests you then you can visit the exhibition at The Ashmolean Museum, Oxford until the 25th September. Just £5 to you. I thought it was excellent, and please find a review from The Oxford Times here.

Posted in Classics, Enrichment, Places to go | Comments Off on Enrichment – places to go

Enrichment – Brexit and historians

brexitSomething for your summer holidays.

If You click here then you will get to a History News network article which summarizes the reaction of different historians to the June vote. The strength of the article is that you can immediately contrast the views and approaches of fundamentally different thinkers.

These include;

  • Niall Ferguson
  • Andrews Roberts
  • Antony Beevor
  • Simon Shama
  • Mary Beard
  • Richard Overy

Have a read and see what you think.

Mr Kydd.

Posted in Enrichment, historians, history in the news, Personal statements | Comments Off on Enrichment – Brexit and historians

“All the past repeats itself and acts only behind new masks”

1870-map-full-forweb_0So said Birdiev – you will find out about him next year.

There is so much happening at the moment that lots of comparisons with events in the past can be drawn. However, Adam Green (in The Economist) seems particularly sharp. Click here to read his article on the 1870 French map which has Britain pictured as an old woman, “isolated and fuming with rage”, turning away decidedly from events on the mainland.

Mr Kydd

Posted in Enrichment, history in the news, maps, Political cartoons | Comments Off on “All the past repeats itself and acts only behind new masks”

Ten History Books I’d Love to See on Your UCAS Form

martin-guerreIt is approaching personal statement time. If you click on the link at the bottom of the page you will get to an article by Jonathan Healey on what you might like to be reading in preparation.

A small extract follows…

“In schools up and down the country, budding young historians are just about to go on a quest: a quest for that perfect UCAS text. The history book you read and analyse in a couple of sentences that you hope will dazzle the admissions people at the university of your choice.

Unfortunately, most will choose terribly.

They will bore readers with the same old references to EH Carr, Richard Evans, David Starkey, and Niall Ferguson. Honestly, having read literally hundreds of these, I cry with joy whenever an applicant has read something a bit different.

Here, then, are some suggestions, for parents, teachers and students alike, to spice up those personal statements. Ten massively cool History books that are that little bit different, that little bit exciting, and that little bit radical and controversial. In interesting ways, and without the need to be a plonker on Newsnight.”

Ten History Books I’d Love to See on Your UCAS Form

Mr Kydd.

Posted in Book Reviews, historians, Personal statements | Comments Off on Ten History Books I’d Love to See on Your UCAS Form

History Today -why the Amada failed

InvincibleArmadaYear Twelve,

If the click here you will get to Geoffrey Woodward’s 1988 article considering the reasons why the Armada failed.

He concludes “when the responsibility for the failure of the Spanish Armada is apportioned, the lion’s share of the blame should go neither to Parma nor to Medina Sidonia, but to Philip II. As Sir Walter Raleigh tersely put it somewhat later: ‘To invade by sea upon a perilous coast, being neither in possession of any port, nor succoured by any party, may better fit a prince presuming on his fortune than enriched with understanding’. The king had created the Armada, and in the end the king destroyed it.”

Have a read and see what you think.

Mr Kydd.

Posted in Enrichment, The Later Tudors | Comments Off on History Today -why the Amada failed

Year Nine prep – reflecting on Auschwitz

_80480260_80480259All,

Following on from today’s lesson, for prep I would like you to do the following.

  •  Explore the three BBC web pages below.

  This account of the 70th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz II-Birkenau (here).

The audio slideshow from the Auschwitz Museum explaining the problems of preserving the ageing and crumbling 191-hectare site, with limited funds (here).

Two experts on Auschwitz arguing for and against the idea that the former Nazi death camp should be allowed to crumble away (here)

  • Then post which view you agree with more (and why) below. One paragraph please.

Please note, for your post to appear, I will need to approve it – so don’t worry it is does not show up straight away.

You can of course discuss this with people at home.

Mr Kydd.

Posted in Uncategorized | 8 Comments

Enrichment – The Dark Ages and the Tintagel problem.

tintagel-reconstruction-700If you click here you will get to an article by Edwin Hustwit in History Today. In it, he discusses the issue of labelling periods of history. He does this by focussing on the so called Dark Ages and Tintagel. He concludes that “when defining any period, that our analyses reflect the diversity and complexity of the past“.

Have a look and see what you think.

Mr Kydd.

Posted in Archaeology, Enrichment | Comments Off on Enrichment – The Dark Ages and the Tintagel problem.

Enrichment – historians and the Brexit debate

150302-Impact-Brexit-BarometerIf you click here you will get to Gideon Rachman’s article in the Financial Times discussing the differing views of historians to the Brexit debate. It is an excellent read, and there is a certain  schadenfreude in watching them fall out with each other. It is however worth making the point there is nothing new about historians getting sucked into political controversies…

” In Germany in the 1960s, an academic argument about whether the country had been responsible for the first world war provoked a ferocious public debate — because of its implication that Nazism was not a solitary aberration in German history. The bicentenary of the French Revolution in 1989 provoked a sharp division between French historians about the true meaning of the events of 1789 — with the left celebrating the revolution as a triumph of liberty and the right emphasising the way in which it had descended into terror and despotism”.

Mr Kydd.

Posted in Enrichment, history in the news, Politics | 1 Comment

Essay plans

Evil_PlanSome materials and plans to help you with your revision.

The PLC can be found here.

Mr Grobien’s quote bank can be found here.

Essay plans can be found below. They must not be seen as a definitive DO IT THIS WAY. Rather, they are a way through that ties your answer to the mark scheme.

It is worth checking back every so often, as fresh plans will be added…

“Power in the Second Reich rested in the hands of the traditional elites” – How far do you agree with this statement ?

The Second Reich became increasingly democratic in the years 1900 – 1914 – How far do you agree with this statement ?

In the years 1900 – 1914 the political establishment in Germany succeeded in maintaining the political status quo through a policy of moderate reform. How far do you agree ? 

Note how the three plans above use the same information in very different ways.

The biggest problem that Weimar Germany faced 1919 – 1923 was its much fated constitution – How far do you agree ?

How far do you agree that life got better for majority of Germans in the period 1924-1929

“Years or stability followed by years of instability” How far do you agree with this view of Weimar Germany in the years 1919 – 1929 ?

“Political Intrigue explains why Hitler was able to become Chancellor in 1933” – How far do you agree with this statement ?

Hitler had fully consolidated his power by the end of 1933. How far do you agree.

“By the end of 1934 Hitler was in total control of Germany.” How far do you agree with this statement

“The main opposition to the Nazis came from the youth” How far do you agree with this judgement ?

“Fear of the terror state was the main reason why opposition did not succeed in overthrowing the Nazi regime in the wartime years” How far do you agree with this statement ?

“The morale of the German public remained remarkably high throughout the Second World War” How far do you agree with this statement ?

Mr Kydd.

Posted in Germany Kaiser to Furhrer course | Comments Off on Essay plans