An essay plan and the fall of the Tsars

An interesting video on the pressures on the regime in the immediate run up to the revolution:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/learningzone/clips/the-abdication-of-tsar-nicholas-ii-in-1917/5672.html

With my group we’ve started to plan the essay. Below is our first thought – we’ll modify this on monday and post a new version.

 Mr Kydd here.

The little BBC bitesize video has a key line in it – “it became apparent how little support the Tsar had”. By 1917 the three “props” (Hans Rogger) of Tsarism had been lost. Rogger suggests that there were three such props;

The Landlords 

The  Church

The Army

It is possible to argue that the Emancipation Edict broke the bond of mutual self interest between the the landlords and the tsar. It is a bit thin but this could be  developed to say that Bloody Sunday did the same for the Tsar’s relationship  with the Church. The key point about the events of 1906 was that the army remained loyal. In 1917 this was not the case – the First World War made sure of that.  

In other words Tsarism’s inability to maintain the support and loyalty of the elites that in required to govern led to the collapse of system under the unique pressure of the First World War.

 

Posted in Mr Podesta's Group | Tagged | Leave a comment

Khrushchev – the reforming Communist who failed ?

As this picture suggests, Khrushchev was a very different figure from Stalin. He is most remembered for the Cuban Missile Crisis which ultimately brought  him down. In the context of our domestic course he is usually portrayed as a failed reformer – we might like to ask is this enough ?

September marks the 40th anniversary of his death, and  this article from Pravda reviews his period in government (1956 – 1964) from a modern Russian point of view. See what you think.

Posted in News | Leave a comment

Fight Club…

Welcome to our first proper go at an online history debate between Little Heath School and Sir Henry Floyd. Our very own fight club, featuring me as Brad Pitt and Mrs Jones as Helen Bonham Carter.

Massive thanks to Mr Podesta (Edward Norton ?) for doing the geeky stuff.

Basics –

1. Each class will need to register in the debating and discussing section of the site.

2. By the 7th October your class will need to post one comment for your side of the motion. Remember that LHS are arguing that Alexander II deserves his reputation as the Tsar Liberator, whilst SHF are arguing that he does not.

3. In the week starting the 10th October, a mystery Oxford historian will then decide the best post and award the life-changing prizes. He will also tell you what he thinks about the topic.

Enjoy…

Mr Kydd.

Posted in News | Leave a comment

An experiment

http://prezi.com/r7ej50rqocyi/the-lateral-reforms-of-alexander-ii/

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Reflections of a Soviet childhood – 1991 revisited

A really lovely article here that describes Nataliya Vasilyeva’s (shown left) memories of being a small child as Communism ended in Russia in 1991. The point here is that in the vastness of Russian History we should never forget that individuals also had their lives changed. Whilst this is no dekulakisation, as Vasilyeva comments, “I could never imagine then that the rules I thought of as unbreakable would dissolve one by one over the next 20 years.”

The article is called “From Lenin to the Bible” – at the moment on the course we are heading the other way.

Posted in News | Leave a comment

Stolypin – The Tragic Fate of Russian Reformers ?

Whilst we are presently traveling through the Tsarist countryside in our lessons, you will be aware of the name Pyotr Stolypin from last summer’s overview work. The 18th September marks the centenary of his assassination. He is a contradictory figure, however it is correct to view him as above a reformer (particularly significant are his agricultural reforms 1906 – 1913). Hite even goes so far as to claim that he was “a potential saviour of Tsarism”. The article here from The Moscow Times discusses Stolypin’s legacy, and chimes with some earlier posts about the fate of reformers. See what you think…

Posted in News | 1 Comment

If you like listening to your history

And you have an mp3 / ipod type thingie, then you might be interested in this.  Actually, there are also many other types of history audiobook on audible.  If you have 30 hours to spare I recommend Jenkins’ biography of Churchill.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Art of Russia- Smashing the Mould

http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00phtcz/The_Art_of_Russia_Smashing_the_Mould/

A very interesting documentary about the relationship between the Communist leadership and art, with analysis of posters and paintings.  A fascinating look into how art was influenced and used by the leaders to promote even very basic messages, for example encouraging workers to read, and advertisments for ‘Communist biscuits’. The presenter argues that Communist posters for products like bread and cigarettes were the predecessors to modern capitalist advertising .  It also gives a great summary of the Communist interpretation of the October Revolution, and the use of cinema to convey this to the masses.  It ends with a look at art after the collapse of Communism, and modern Russian art. I thoroughly recommend watching it.  (It’s only available until Tues 13th September, but I will look into finding the whole series).

Mrs Canning

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Putin compares himself to Poytr Stolypin

We are quickly approaching the 100th anniversary of the assassination of Poytr Stolypin, Prime Minister of Russia from 1906 to 1911. You will come across him first via his incomplete, but potentially very effective agriarian reforms. Stolypin, together with Sergie Witte is sometimes represented as “a potential saviour” (Hite) of Tsarism. Perhaps. He is certainly a contradictory figure. His time as Prime Minister is as known for his political repression (the famed Stolypin Necktie) as economic reforms. An important early lesson here therefore might be to stress that poltical repression and economic reform (modernisation) can happen at the same time.

Here (an article from the Moscow News) reflects on how Vladimir Putin, who perhaps eyes a return to the presidency, likes to compare himself to Stolypin.

Read the article, and as we come across Stolypin this year you might like to consider / comment on the validity of comparison. Finally look out for more about Stoylpin in the next three weeks.

Mr Kydd.

Posted in News, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Twenty years ago the plot to restore Communism collapsed.

Twenty years ago I was your age, and I remember feeling genuine fear when the news came through that hardliners had imprisoned the reforming Mikhail Gorbachev (left). The plot was broadly to overthrow the reformer and restore Communist rule. For a moment it felt like the Cold War was on its way back.

The plot failed, and ironically it actually speeded reform. A good account of it can be found here. It does however reflect a key theme of our course – is reform or reaction the most effective way to rule Russia. In our period the reformers, Khrushchev, Alexander II and perhaps even the Kerensky all lost power. The effective repressors, Stalin and Alexander III faired better. Gorbachev the reformer was greatly weakened by the coup attempt of 1991, and Yeltsin soon replaced him.

In a BBC interview to mark the twentieth anniversary here Gorbachev compares the dominant poltical figure of our century, Putin to Stalin. He claims that Putin has ‘castrated’ democracy in Russia. See what you think. One thing is however clear today Putin – the ex-KGB man is a more popular figure in Russia than Gobachev – the man who ended the Cold War. Draw your own conclusions on that one…

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment